As method of organizing my thoughts on this excerpt manifesto (from Ulrich Conrad's Programs and Manifestoes on 20th-Century Architecture), I will quote some interesting things from this passage:
- "We live for the most part within enclosed spaces. These form the environment from which our culture grows. Our culture is in a a sense a product of architecture."
- "It was the railway station that produced the brick metropolis culture of today from which we all suffer. Glass architecture will come only when the metropolis in our sense of the word has been done away with."
(1): It's a strange thought, that culture is a product of man-made, unnatural things, that instead of culture shaping the architecture, it is the architecture (the environment) that shapes the culture. I would guess it makes sense after some x amount of years....maybe its in cycles: At first, culture creates the architecture, x years pass by, then the architecture-environment modifies the culture. Then new modified culture creates new architecture, etc.
(2): But then if we only build steel, glass structures, wouldn't we suffer from the glass metropolis in the future, when another form or material is introduced to replace steel, concrete and glass?
Paul Scheerbert's poetic obsession over glass.
He completely ignores the rules of the real environment: heat gain = a very, very hot, and energy inefficient metropolis.
